One Response

  1. Robert Clifford
    Robert Clifford at |

    My approach, as a long-time management system auditor and trainer, was to advise clients/auditors that there are always ‘findings’. They’re the natural outcome of any part of the audit … the comparison of a requirement and evidence yields only two outcomes, conformance or non-conformance (well, there’s also the audit trail, but that’s for another lesson). And that there is worth in all of the ‘findings’. Non-conformance causes investigation, determining of the need for corrective action, and corrective action that is, by definition, corrective or an improvement from its antonym, defective. And conformant findings are not merely cause for celebration. If there is conformance, there is value, leverage, something to emulate within the organization, and do more of. That is the way I turned the pejorative … ‘findings’ … into the true benefit that they are.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.